INTRODUCTION
Brief History, Access to Returns,
Unfilmed Census,
Recovering Lost Souls
THE RECOVERY PROJECT
History,
Methods,
Publication and
Statistics
DISTRICTS
AFFECTED
Manchester,
Chorlton,
Salford,
Ashton-under-Lyne,
Oldham
WHERE TO FIND IT
CDROM, Online, Libraries
FREE NAME INDEX
Search for Your Ancestors
FREE STREET INDEX
Find streets and places
CASE STUDIES
Elizabeth Gaskell
Samuel Bamford
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CONTACT US |
|
History
Ray Hulley (pictured) the Project Leader writes of the start of the project:
"It
all started as far as I was concerned in the Local Studies Library at
Manchester in July 1989 when I came across a verbatim account of the
Insolvency Hearing of Robert Churchman Hulley MD held at Lancaster Assizes
in December 1851. He was described as formerly of 25 St John Street and late
of 49 Great Jackson Street Manchester. I found him living at St John Street
on the filmed census returns for the Deansgate sub-district but I was
interested in finding out more about the Great Jackson Street address. The
returns for the western side of Great Jackson Street were complete but those
for the eastern side were missing and I was informed by the staff that they
had been lost. This was a big disappointment and it wasn’t until 1991 that I
helped to correct this situation. In March 1991 I joined an expectant group
of several London-based Manchester and Lancashire Family History Society
members at a meeting held at the Public Record Office Chancery Lane when
John Coupe the Society’s editor of its 1851 surname index books and Susan
Lumas of the PRO explained the background and proposed modus operandi of the
transcription project." (To see Ray's final report on the project,
please
CLICK HERE.
Methods
The work was commenced under Ray's leadership by a small team of volunteers
working at Chancery Lane. Volunteers were not initially allowed to use any
form of artificial light and reliance on natural daylight was the only means
of reading the badly damaged returns. Completed transcriptions were
forwarded to a team of volunteers based in Manchester under the leadership
of Frances de Courcy for entry into a database. The project was later
transferred to Kew with the formation of The National Archives in 1997. At
Kew, the team was under the general supervision of the Conservation
Department whose Head Mario Aleppo went out of his way to assist. Mario
introduced the team to the latest ultra-violet (UV) scanning equipment and
we entered a brand new world of text recovery! Our recovery rates improved
so much that we decided to re-examine those returns previously transcribed
to increase the numbers recovered. A number of the most fragile pages had
been laminated to protect them. The Conservation Department were kind enough
to remove the lamination temporarily. This noticeably improved our recovery
rate.
Details on the returns were
transcribed in so far as they were legible and in many cases this means that
only parts of names or other details could be deciphered or there was
uncertainty, particularly regarding names. In some cases contemporary street
directories and rate books were used to confirm that names had been
interpreted correctly. Temptation was, however, resisted to include
information which it was felt "should" have been present if it could not
actually be seen on the page.
Publication
When the project produced its first completed transcripts, microfiche was
the obvious choice for the publication of what would ultimately amount to
tens of thousands of pages. It was the intention from the outset to publish
reconstituted pages showing as precisely as possible what could be
deciphered on each page. Name and street indexes were derived from the data
to assist the users. Printed masters were produced from the databases
initially by the late Alec Marlow and later by John Marsden and transferred
to microfiche by a local company.
As the 20th century drew to a
close, publishing on CDROM became a practical alternative which allowed us
to considerably reduce publication costs and make it easier to access the
material (very soon more people had computers than owned microfiche
readers). Data for newly completed sub-districts was immediately published on CDROM and previous material was reissued in this format.
The launch of the Federation of
Family History Societies' pay-to-view site
FamilyHistoryOnline
provided a new means of making this data more widely available and at lower
cost to those whose use would be limited. Images of the reconstituted pages
were published on the site and made accessible via a name index.
The project continued for over
14 years and concluded in 2005 with the publication of the final
sub-district returns (Chorlton-on-Medlock).
Statistics
From a starting point where this material was considered lost, a surprising
amount of information has been recovered. The recovery rates are shown in
the table below. Because the data had been analysed before the books were
damaged, we know quite precisely the numbers of people who should have been
found in each district. The overall recovery rate of 82% is the more
impressive given that parts of some pages had completely disintegrated with
the inevitable loss of all the details they contained.
District
and Sub-district
|
Township
or Place
|
Total population in unfilmed or damaged returns
|
Recovered
entries
|
Recovered
%age
|
CHORLTON |
|
|
|
|
Ardwick |
Rusholme |
3749
|
3748
|
100
|
|
Gorton |
4476
|
4328
|
97
|
|
Openshaw |
3759
|
3213
|
85
|
|
Ardwick |
15793
|
11805
|
75
|
Chorlton upon Medlock |
Chorlton upon Medlock # |
25537
|
15020
|
59
|
Hulme |
Hulme |
20798
|
18391
|
88
|
# excludes 10,021 missing returns |
|
|
|
|
SALFORD |
|
|
|
|
Pendleton |
Pendleton |
14136
|
6994
|
50
|
|
Pendlebury |
2750
|
1811
|
66
|
Greengate |
Salford, part of |
35216
|
30055
|
85
|
Regent Road |
Salford, part of |
11097
|
10902
|
98
|
MANCHESTER |
|
|
|
|
Deansgate |
Manchester, part of |
19390
|
18439
|
95
|
London Road |
Manchester, part of |
15742
|
11785
|
75
|
St. George |
Manchester, part of |
11780
|
10433
|
89
|
Blackley |
Harpurhey and Blackley |
3937
|
3745
|
95
|
Prestwich |
Prestwich, Great, Little Heaton |
5050
|
4481
|
89
|
ASHTON under LYNE |
|
|
|
|
Knott Lanes |
Knott Lanes |
6047
|
5871
|
97
|
Ashton Town |
Ashton Town # |
12754
|
12235
|
96
|
# excludes 4,737 missing returns |
|
|
|
|
OLDHAM |
|
|
|
|
Oldham |
Oldham-below-town |
5706
|
5642
|
99
|
GRAND TOTAL
|
|
217,717
|
178,898
|
82%
|
Return to top of
page Last modified
17 August 2009 |